Related Q&A(s): 377 380 392 403 406 448 452 456 461 471 473 474 481 483 494 496 500 501 505 509 513 516 539 540 546 547 548 549 550

The Question (ID Number 547)...

It seems to be that there is only choice between the Takers and the Leavers and is that choice really possible? But what would it mean if we base our assumptions on the choice between Takers and Leavers-mentality and a value-system based on Givers and Receivers-attitude? So that we become more aware of Nature as a Giver and that receiving is included. Instead of trying to get more or less of it.

...and the response:

I didn't write Ishmael to present people with a choice between being Leavers or Takers but to show them why Leavers had (and have) a sustainable way to live while we do not. It's not just a matter of choice, like deciding whether to be a Republican or a Democrat. Being a Leaver is not a matter of attitude. The speech "The New Renaissance" on this website presents (in as concise a form as I've been able to achieve) the future we have to be reaching for.

Related Q&A(s): 377 380 392 403 406 448 452 456 461 471 473 474 481 483 494 496 500 501 505 509 513 516 539 540 546 547 548 549 550