Home
Find Out About
DQ and RennieDQ's booksTranslations"What to do? What to do?"New Tribal VenturesVideo tapesThis websiteRights and PermissionsUpcoming eventsRecent eventsThings To Do
Buy signed Quinn booksInvite DQRead guestbookBuy Ish in BulkSign guestbookSearch guestbookBuy a bookLink to us!Spread the WordFind a Local GroupJoin the networkMake connectionsHelp/Sponsor usContact usVisit NTV marketThings To Read
News and InfoQ & AScience of IshInterviews and ...ParablesEssays and ...DQ's book listNetwork book listPrivacy policyReviews of DQ's WorkFor Teachers
SchoolsCoursesIsh teacher guideBC study guide
|
"There's only one way you can force people to accept an intolerable lifestyle." "Yeah," I said. "You have to lock up the food." My Ishmael
|
|
|
Check out the News and Information Announcements... |
UNIT 32 Tribes and Communes
Why is it unnecessary for a tribe to be communal?
After doing some research on the communal movement, have students write a paper on this question: Was "making a living" an important issue or irrelevant to the success or failure of most communes?
In the lore of police drama as seen in films and on television, "partners" constitute a sort of tribe. The partners "make a living" together, at least in the sense that they depend on each other for their very lives. In fact, the tribal closeness of partners often interferes with their family lives. Why? Does each department (vice, homicide, and so on) constitute a sort of "tribe of tribes"?
What other tribes are the popular subject of television dramatic series? Lawyers? Emergency Room physicians?
Why are people "making a living together" the subject of drama while people "living together" are more likely to be the subject of situation comedy?
Who are the Amish?
Can you think of other examples of the "familiar bipolarity" Quinn mentions, which sees people as incapable of being anything but either totally selfish or totally altruistic?
|
|
|
